On Oct 18, 2010, at 10:10 AM, Jack Bates wrote: > On 10/18/2010 11:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: >> >> More accurately... A /48 per customer end-site... >> > > Define end0-site. Residential customers, for example, don't need more than a > /56. More would just be obscene. Most small businesses don't need more than a > /56 either, especially if you are breaking them up into different sites > (versus assigning a /48 to customer and dividing that block up to different > sites). > > You are wrong. Residential customers should get /48s. /56s seemed like a good idea at the time, but, they aren't. It's not just about counting subnets. There's also the issue of needing bits for self-defining hierarchical topologies. 8 bits isn't enough for that. 16 is.
Seriously... This isn't IPv4. The scarcity mentality is causing harm and driving decisions that will have a limiting effect on innovation that is already in progress. Owen
