On Nov 2, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Karl Auer wrote: > On Tue, 2010-11-02 at 09:03 -0700, Owen DeLong wrote: >>> About the only hack I can see that *might* make sense would be that home >>> CPE does NOT honour the upstream lifetimes if upstream connectivity is >>> lost, but instead keeps the prefix alive on very short lifetimes until >>> upstream connectivity returns. >>> >> Which is exactly what was being proposed when Tim responded that it >> would break the IPv6 spec. > > Yes it does. But as long as there is no upstream connectivity, it > doesn't matter. Personally I don't think it makes a *lot* of sense, but > it does make some. > Sounds like we're in violent agreement.
Owen