I use HE.NET in a few installations (with BGP) and they have good support (which is quite awesome for a free service).
As people pointed out avoid 6to4, Apple just rendered it nearly useless in its latest OS-X. ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeroen van Aart" <jer...@mompl.net> To: "NANOG list" <nanog@nanog.org> Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2010 9:07:53 AM Subject: Re: IPv6 6to4 and dns Mark Andrews wrote: > Firstly I would use a tunnel broker instead of 6to4. Easier to > debug failures. Thanks all for the helpful response. Using the same names for IPv6 and IPv4 doesn't appear to be much of a problem, especially considering this is a trial which concerns office/home ISP connectivity, for now. Which IPv6 tunnel broker is preferable, or does it really matter? Thanks, Jeroen
