On Mon, Nov 22, 2010 at 18:33, Daniel Hagerty <h...@linnaean.org> wrote:
> Ambiguating usages like "Take the least signifigant quad of that > ipv6 address" to mean either 16 bits or 64 bits, when it currently is > unamibigously 64 bits won't make the lives of C/C++ programmers > writing IPv6 code any easier. Agreed. Thanks a lot for pointing this out. Comments like this are incredibly valuable to me. I think I will still add quad to -03 as it has been requested a lot of times, but more to point out and document that there is a significant problem with it than anything else. Thanks again, Richard