On Fri, 3 Dec 2010, Valdis.Kletnieks at vt.edu wrote: > On Fri, 03 Dec 2010 17:30:38 PST, Brent Jones said: > > For example, below shows the same MX at Google responding with and > > without TLS. I attempted about a dozen times over a few minutes to the > > same MX until I got STARTTLS listed in the capabilities list, but the > > next attempt to the same MX would no longer show STARTTLS > > Equally troubling is the similarly random nature of PIPELINING, which doesn't > even match the STARTTLS appearing or not. Definitely bad juju.
PIPELINING and STARTTLS are unrelated issues, and both are currently working as intended. - STARTTLS on MX is in the process of being rolled out and not visible from all client locations at this point. - PIPELINING is not offered under all circumstances. Hope this helps, maw -- m...@{dont.,}beevil.org