On 3/21/07 2:41 AM, Tarig Ahmed wrote: > > Is it true that NAT can provide more security? >
No. However, some things like PCI compliance require NAT, likely because of the "NAT = super hacker firewall" concept. ~Seth
On 3/21/07 2:41 AM, Tarig Ahmed wrote: > > Is it true that NAT can provide more security? >
No. However, some things like PCI compliance require NAT, likely because of the "NAT = super hacker firewall" concept. ~Seth