On Jan 12, 2011, at 8:54 AM, Fernando Gont wrote: > On 12/01/2011 01:17 p.m., George Bonser wrote: > >> But your security person needs to shift their thinking because the >> purpose of NAT and private addressing is to conserve IP address, not to >> provide security. With IPv6, the concept of NAT goes away. > > You have heard about NAT66, right? > Yes... Hopefully it was just a bad dream.
NATing IPv6 doesn't do anything good. There's no benefit, only cost. Owen