I think the ship has sailed for the class E /8s. Using them will require significant effort and that effort, both time and money, is better spent on deploying IPv6.
regards Carlos On 2/1/11 9:45 AM, Owen DeLong wrote: > On Jan 31, 2011, at 10:43 PM, George Bonser wrote: > >>> 3. Busting out 16 more /8s only delays the IPv4 endgame by about a >>> year. >>> >>> jms >> If used for general assignment, sure. But if used for what people have >> been begging for NAT444 middle-4 space. Well, that might work. Code >> update on the CPE is all it would take. The systems involved would >> never see it. >> >> > If they could do code updates on the CPE, then, they could use RFC-1918. > > The problem is that code-updating that much CPE is, well, impractical to > say the least. > > Owen
