________________________________ From: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com>
David Barak Need Geek Rock? Try The Franchise: http://www.listentothefranchise.com >If you're determined to destroy IPv6 by bringing the problems of NAT forward >with you, then, I'm fine with you remaining in your >IPv4 island. I'm willing >to >bet that most organizations will embrace an internet unencumbered by the >brokenness that is NAT and >move forward. I do not think that lack of NAT has >been a significant barrier to IPv6 adoption, nor do I think it will be. Lack of NAT may or may not continue to be a barrier to IPv6 adoption. However, it certainly *has* been a barrier to IPv6 adoption - I have had customers tell me that explicitly, and I have no reason to doubt them.