[Reply-To: set to -futures@, as I don't think this is an operational issue.]

On Feb 7, 2011, at 4:55 PM, Owen DeLong wrote:

> Reaching the web site requires more than an ip6.arpa record.
> 
> It requires an AAAA record:

In the e-mail to which you are replying (and top-posting, no less :), Mike 
said: "I'm bugging the powers-that-be about getting forward records working."  
While I agree doing v6 is nice and all, I think brow-beating an un-paid 
volunteer on something they already said they were trying to get working is a 
bit much.

Remember, this is a community effort.  The people running the web & name 
servers are donating their time & their companies' resources to the community.  
If you believe they are doing it wrong, please step up and help.  Input is 
great, encouraged even.  Help is better.

Complaining about NewNOG (soon to be NANOG) is complaining about -yourself-.  
If you are reading this message, you ARE NewNOG.

-- 
TTFN,
patrick


> baikal:owen (68) ~ % host -t AAAA www.newnog.org                              
>                         2011/02/07 13:51:23
> www.newnog.org has no AAAA record
> 
> And it requires the host answer on port 80 at its IPv6 address, which
> does appear to already be the case.
> 
> So, when I'm informed that the AAAA record is up, I'll retest.
> 
> Owen
> 
> 
> On Feb 7, 2011, at 1:45 PM, Scott Weeks wrote:
> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------
>>> On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 12:40:41PM -0800, Owen DeLong wrote:
>>> 
>>>> I'll happily join Newnog/NANOG and pay my dues when I can reach the
>>>> web site ot do so on IPv6 rather than legacy IPv4.
>> 
>> Yes it does.  2001:4970:EEEE:7777::2  I'm bugging the powers-that-be about 
>> getting forward records working.
>> 
>> [root@wa-geeks ~]# host 2001:4970:eeee:7777::2
>> 2.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.0.7.7.7.7.e.e.e.e.0.7.9.4.1.0.0.2.ip6.arpa 
>> domain name pointer www.newnog.org.
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Now your only question is check or pay pal...  :-)
>> 
>> scott
> 
> 


Reply via email to