Lucky you.
.as
On 11 Feb 2011, at 11:42, Josh Smith wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 6:07 AM, Arturo Servin <arturo.ser...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>>
>> On 11 Feb 2011, at 04:51, Ricky Beam wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, 11 Feb 2011 00:31:21 -0500, David Conrad <d...@virtualized.org>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Amusingly enough, I personally (along with others) made arguments along
>>>> these lines back in 1995 or so when the IAB was coming out with
>>>> http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1814.txt. Given the publication of 1814, you
>>>> can probably guess how far those arguments fared.
>>>
>>> You missed the "anticipates external connectivity to the Internet" part.
>>> Networks that never touch the internet have RFC1918 address space to use.
>>> (and that works 99.999% of the time.)
>>>
>>
>> Except in acquisitions and private peering.
>>
>> as
>
> Especially during acquisitions, my $EMPLOYEER has made several
> acquisitions recently and every one of them was wrought with painful
> RFC1918 overlap problems.
>
> Thanks,
> Josh Smith
> KD8HRX
> email/jabber: juice...@gmail.com
> phone: 304.237.9369(c)
