On 14 feb 2011, at 6:46, Frank Bulk wrote: > Requiring them to be on certain well known addresses is restrictive and > creates an unnecessary digression from IPv4 practice. It's comments like > this that raise the hair on admins' necks. At least mine.
I don't get this. Why spend cycles discovering a value that doesn't need to change? But I lost this argument in the IETF years ago, so I guess I'm relatively alone here.
