On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 10:52:37AM -0800, George Bonser wrote: > > What I have done on point to points and small subnets between routers > is to simply make static neighbor entries. That eliminates any > neighbor table exhaustion causing the desired neighbors to become > unreachable. I also do the same with neighbors at public peering > points. Yes, that comes at the cost of having to reconfigure the > entry if a MAC address changes, but that doesn't happen often.
And this is better than just not trying to implement IPv6 stateless auto-configuration on ptp links in the first place how exactly? Don't get taken in by the people waving an RFC around without actually taking the time to do a little critical thinking on their own first, /64s and auto-configuration just don't belong on router ptp links. And btw only a handful of routers are so poorly designed that they depend on not having subnets longer than /64s when doing IPv6 lookups, and there are many other good reasons why you should just not be using those boxes in the first place. :) -- Richard A Steenbergen <r...@e-gerbil.net> http://www.e-gerbil.net/ras GPG Key ID: 0xF8B12CBC (7535 7F59 8204 ED1F CC1C 53AF 4C41 5ECA F8B1 2CBC)