----- Original Message ----- > From: "Valdis Kletnieks" <valdis.kletni...@vt.edu>
> On Thu, 07 Apr 2011 12:23:12 PDT, Jeroen van Aart said: > > Sachs, Marcus Hans (Marc) wrote: > > > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc6214/ > > > > That RFC is the opposite of funny (to me). Just because rfc1149 is > > funny > > that doesn't mean that repetitions of it are funny too. Quite the > > contrary. > > Yes, but I bet many providers recognize rfc1149 now. rfc6214 gives us > a new brown M&M to put into the contracts... I wonder what NYC paramedic David Roth would think, to find out that he'd coined a bit of technical jargon, quite by accident. Cheers, -- jra