On Apr 19, 2011, at 5:50 PM, Doug Barton wrote: > At minimum one would hope that you're heeding the warnings in the first. > Another view (one that I personally hold) is that any effort you might be > putting into making 6to4 work better would be better placed in deploying real > IPv6 instead; and that the world would be a better place generally if all of > the so-called "transition mechanisms" just went away.
I certainly feel that the lawful-intercept requirements and data retention necessary in a CGN/6to4 environment likely mean the barrier is high enough to suggest moving to IPv6, but the CPE situation is still mostly missing. - Jared
