On Mon, May 9, 2011 at 11:01, Joel Jaeggli <joe...@bogus.com> wrote: > On 5/9/11 5:06 AM, TJ wrote: > > Unfortunately, I suspect many organizations will be following that > approach. > > > > I hope that some will instead see this as a great opportunity for the > last > > step in making their public services IPv6 reachable *... and that they > also > > start/continue/complete taking IPv6 within their internal networks as > well.* > > my ipv6 peering with yahoo came up like 8 months ago... >
Sure, but peering is not the same as publicly/universally reachable services. I hope that World IPv6 Day raises enough awareness, and yields enough success stories, that we make some noticeable progress in the near future. > I don't think there's anything particularly unfortunate about what major > content providers are doing with ipv6, give them customers and they wil > support them. > It is unfortunate (to me), because content providers being accessible is an important step in breaking this chicken-egg scenario. We need the service providers and content providers to make this "IPv6 thing" usable/relevant - and (just IMHO) the sooner the better. /TJ