> I might not explain the background clearly and confused people. We're > doing research on multiple origin AS issue, and we want to confirm if > our inference is correct based on history data we collected. For > example, we found several hundreds of prefixes with multiple origins > more than two, some of them were inferred as anycast using our > methodology, but we're not positive with the conjecture, so we want to > find the ground truth from operators. Thanks for the detailed > explanations.
the ucla obsession with multiple-origin announcements has a long history. the problem is that you think you can make something that looks forward. but how will you decide if tomorrow's announcement of P from A0 and A1 is anycast, ops kink, or an actual mis-announcement? randy