On May 15, 2011, at 8:28 AM, Matthew Kaufman wrote: > On 5/15/2011 6:49 AM, Cameron Byrne wrote: >> >> >> On May 14, 2011 9:30 PM, "Matthew Kaufman" <matt...@matthew.at >> <mailto:matt...@matthew.at>> wrote: >> > >> >> > >> > Sure, but NAT64 doesn't let SIP phones on an IPv6-only network talk to SIP >> > phones on an IP4-only network. >> > >> >> Right, that is why we have SBC / b2bue for the cases we want to work. >> > > Ok, so you concede that NAT64 requires yet another device at the edge to make > the SIP phones work... >> >> >> We have agreed to disagree on the value of this before. Sorry your not so >> popular protocol is going the way of EGP .... it's just not fit for the >> evolving internet and will be subject to natural deselction. I am sure you >> will disagree with that and insist every end user must always support ipv4 >> because rtmfp is top of mind for so many users .... but we can leave it at >> that ....please >> >> > > ...and we'll agree to disagree on this one (RTMFP)... and users will just be > ok with BitTorrent and Skype not working on the v6-only + NAT64 networks > you're building, I suppose? > > Matthew Kaufman
Uh, BitTorrent works just fine for me on IPv6. Owen
