>Which they should be ready to do already, since didn't the US Govt. >mandate IPv6 support sometime last century? ;)
Yeah, it runs over GOSIP. R's, John
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address ... Joel Jaeggli
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal add... Mark Andrews
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal... Cameron Byrne
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for inte... Owen DeLong
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Christopher Morrow
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Cameron Byrne
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Valdis . Kletnieks
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Cameron Byrne
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Mark Andrews
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... John Levine
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Kevin Oberman
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Mark Andrews
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Jimmy Hess
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Patrick W. Gilmore
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Jimmy Hess
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Cameron Byrne
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... David Conrad
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Owen DeLong
- Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Byron L. Hicks
- RE: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for ... Leigh Porter
