> From nanog-bounces+bonomi=mail.r-bonomi....@nanog.org Wed May 25 13:44:21 > 2011 > Date: Wed, 25 May 2011 14:43:24 -0400 > Subject: Re: Rogers Canada using 7.0.0.0/8 for internal address space > From: Christopher Pilkington <c...@0x1.net> > To: Michael Dillon <wavetos...@googlemail.com> > Cc: NANOG <nanog@nanog.org> > > On Wed, May 25, 2011 at 1:25 AM, Michael Dillon > <wavetos...@googlemail.com> wrote: > > So we should CONDONE such borrowing and recommend a couple of /8s to > > use in North America. Perhaps one could be DOD for those operators > > that do not carry any DOD traffic and one could be that /8 from > > Softbank Japan, 126/8 if I recall it correctly. People who carry DOD > > traffic could borrow the APNIC block. > > I recommend 44/8. Does it make sense that ham radio operators have > routable IP address space any longer? (Seems to be still advertised, > though.)
Still advertised, still in (light, limited) use.
