In message <201106180718.p5i7irbe020...@mail.r-bonomi.com>, Robert Bonomi write
s:
> 
> > Subject: Re: ICANN to allow commercial gTLDs
> > From: Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com>
> >
> > MacDonald's would likely get title to .macdonalds under the new rules, 
> > right?
> >
> > Well... Which MacDonald's?
> >
> >  1. The fast food chain
> >  2. O.C. MacDonald's Plumbing Supply
> >  3. MacDonald and Sons Paving Systems
> >  4. MacDonald and Madison Supply Company
> >  5. etc.
> 
> Easy to resolve (excuse the pun) _that_ one.
> 
> The _senior_ claimant to that domain would be Clan MacDonald, of Scotland.
> 
> Who gets 'apple'?  Apple (the computer company), Apple (the record company)?
>   How about the 'fruit of the month' club?
> 
> Now, if you want a _hard_ problem, who gets to register 'YellowPages' ?
> <*EVIL* grin>
 
YellowPages would work.  It's used under licence.

au.YellowPages
uk.YellowPages
 
As for single label hostnames, RFC 897 got rid of single label
hostnames and they should not come back.  They are a security issue,
see RFC 1535.

This has been pointed out in the past.

Mark
-- 
Mark Andrews, ISC
1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia
PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742                 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org

Reply via email to