On 6/26/11 5:34 PM, Mark Andrews wrote: > In message <20110627002625.4c8531137...@drugs.dv.isc.org>, Mark Andrews writes > : >> >> In message <banlktikzmcshaxffwq2pidfpkxctqtr...@mail.gmail.com>, Deric Kwok >> wr >> ites: >>> Hi all >>> >>> I am trying to configure website for testing ipv6 >>> >>> Just wander how internet users eg: DSL users can visit this website >>> and any people can access this website over the world >>> >>> Thank you >> >> About 10-6% of the net is dual stack capable, there is a working >> IPv6 path from the brower to the server. About 0.4% of the net >> prefers IPv6 over IPv4. It was higher but changes to depreference >> using 2002::/16 (6to4) as a source address have been pushed in >> various OS updates. >> >> http://www.potaroo.net/stats/1x1/sitec/v6hosts.png > > I meant to post the aggregate graph. > > http://www.potaroo.net/stats/1x1/v6hosts.png > >> This is updated daily. >> >> APNIC/Geoff could use more test data sources. >> http://labs.apnic.net/index.shtml >> >> Mark >> -- >> Mark Andrews, ISC >> 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia >> PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: ma...@isc.org >>
The more optimistic number was that something like 20% - 30% of clients could retrieve an IPV6-Only Literal URL. So yeah, still sad, but there is some potential there. --- John Kemp (k...@routeviews.org) RouteViews Engineer NOC: h...@routeviews.org http://www.routeviews.org