On 07/14/2011 11:35 PM, Jared Mauch wrote: >> Well, unless there's some layer-2 anti-spoofing mitigation in >> place, with /64 subnets the "local attacker" typically *will* have >> enough addresses. > > Solving a local attack
Well, I was talking about not *introducing* ;-) one. > is something I consider different in scope > than the current draft being discussed in 6man, v6ops, ipv6@ etc... Which I-D are you referring to? Thanks, -- Fernando Gont e-mail: ferna...@gont.com.ar || fg...@acm.org PGP Fingerprint: 7809 84F5 322E 45C7 F1C9 3945 96EE A9EF D076 FFF1
