> -----Original Message----- > From: Randy Bush [mailto:ra...@psg.com] > Sent: 07 September 2011 11:18 > To: Leigh Porter > Cc: North American Network Operators' Group > Subject: Re: NAT444 or ? > > > I'm going to have to deploy NAT444 with dual-stack real soon now. > > you may want to review the presentations from last week's apnic meeting > in busan. real mesurements. sufficiently scary that people who were > heavily pushing nat444 for the last two years suddenly started to say > "it was not me who pushed nat444, it was him!" as if none of us had a > memory. > > randy >
Thankyou, I'm watching it now, but I am under no illusion that it will work well. NAT44 is bad enough. -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________