> -----Original Message----- > From: valdis.kletni...@vt.edu [mailto:valdis.kletni...@vt.edu] > Sent: 07 September 2011 23:14 > To: Dorn Hetzel > Cc: Leigh Porter; NANOG > Subject: Re: NAT444 or ? > > On Wed, 07 Sep 2011 16:13:26 EDT, Dorn Hetzel said: > > > Perhaps it can be made ever so slightly less ugly if endpoints get an > > "address" that consists of a 32 bit IP address + (n) upper bits of > > port number. > > > > This might be 4 significant bits to share an IP 16 ways, or 8 > > significant bits to share it 256 ways, or whatever. > > And you store the 4 or 8 bits in what part of the IPv4 header, exactly?
Nobody uses the TOS bits, do they? ;-) -- Leigh ______________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System. For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email ______________________________________________________________________