Nat444 or frontal labotomy hmm let's see at least with the second I would still be able to make a living as a micro soft network admin;)
Sent from my iPhone On 2011-09-14, at 6:07 PM, "James Jones" <[email protected]> wrote: > On 9/14/11 2:46 PM, Leo Bicknell wrote: >> In a message written on Thu, Sep 15, 2011 at 09:24:25AM +1200, Don >> Gould wrote: >>> How many of you have sat and thought about the merit of this web >>> site? >> Ok, I'll take a swing at your list... >> >>> * Does Juniper break promises? >> Yes. >> >>> * Does Cisco break them? >> Yes. >> >>> * What bad things and experiences have you had with Cisco, Juniper? >> It might take me several days, and many pages to compile that list. >> >>> * What is the best technology for each company? >> Cisco: The AGS+ was ahead of its time. >> Jiniper: The Olive is quite nifty. >> >>> * Did you know that Cisco has a 100Gb solution? >> Yes, but I can't afford it. >> >> Now, with that out of the way, how much does everyone else hate >> even the >> thought of NAT444? >> >> :) :) :) >> > > Just the thought of NAT444 makes my stomach turn. > > >
