On 9/19/2011 6:02 PM, Jon Lewis wrote:
On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Frank Bulk wrote:
I should have made myself more clear -- the policy amendment would make
clear that multihoming requires only one facilities-based connection and
that the other connections could be fulfilled via tunnels. This may be
heresy for some.
That's not multihoming.
Note that for the purpose of needing an AS number, it most certainly
is... as the result is distinct routing policy from either the
facilities-based provider or the source of the tunnel(s).
Matthew Kaufman
