Couldn't you also advertise the /48 from all the sites, if you're willing to sort things out over the inter-site VPNs?--Richard On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Mikael Abrahamsson <swm...@swm.pp.se> wrote: > On Mon, 31 Oct 2011, Dmitry Cherkasov wrote: > >> Need your advice: is this normal to distribute /48 by /56 parts across >> locations or should we obtain separate /48 for each of them? Or maybe we >> need /32 that can be split into multiple /48? Anyway we are not ISP so /48 >> looks quite reasonable and sufficient for all our needs. > > Don't expect anyone to accept less than /48, so in your setup you need a /48 > per site. > > -- > Mikael Abrahamsson email: swm...@swm.pp.se > >
- using IPv6 address block across multiple locations Dmitry Cherkasov
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locat... Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple l... Richard Barnes
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multip... Ricky Beam
- Re: using IPv6 address block across mu... Dmitry Cherkasov
- Re: using IPv6 address block acro... Justin M. Streiner
- Re: using IPv6 address block ... Owen DeLong
- Re: using IPv6 address block acro... Owen DeLong
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locat... Jeroen Massar
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple l... Joel jaeggli
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multip... Steven Bellovin
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locat... Randy Carpenter
- Re: using IPv6 address block across multiple locat... Owen DeLong