Wonderful. I would urge SPs based stateside to strongly consider endorsing the MAAWG comments.
thanks suresh On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 5:06 PM, O'Reirdan, Michael <michael_oreir...@cable.comcast.com> wrote: > MAAWG has written voicing its concerns on SOPA and PIPA. > > http://www.maawg.org/sites/maawg/files/news/MAAWG_US_Congress_S968-HR3261_Comments_2011-12.pdf > > Mike > ________________________________________ > From: Suresh Ramasubramanian [ops.li...@gmail.com] > Sent: 14 December 2011 05:12 > To: Hal Murray > Cc: nanog@nanog.org > Subject: Re: EFF call for signatures from Internet engineers against > censorship > > I would strongly suggest that operators work with their legal > departments to endorse this paper by Crocker and others. > > If other ISP organizations (such as say MAAWG) come out with > something, other operators could sign on to that as well. > > The EFF petition has way too much propaganda and far less content than > would be entirely productive in a policy discussion. > > --srs > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2011 at 12:51 PM, Hal Murray <hmur...@megapathdsl.net> wrote: >> >> Security and Other Technical Concerns Raised by the >> DNS Filtering Requirements in the PROTECT IP Bill >> Authors: >> Steve Crocker, Shinkuro, Inc. >> David Dagon, Georgia Tech >> Dan Kaminsky, DKH >> Danny McPherson, Verisign, Inc. >> Paul Vixie, Internet Systems Consortium > > > > -- > Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com) > -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
