2011/12/15 Mark Tinka <[email protected]>
> On Thursday, December 15, 2011 10:42:37 PM Leo Bicknell > wrote: > > > However, there may be a simpler explanation. If you bill > > by the bit as a transit provider it's in your best > > interest to make sure your customer gets as many bits > > through you as possible. Plus if you can fill their > > pipe, they need to buy an upgrade to you. > > Indeed. > > Forgive my ignorance, but are connections between ISP's normally billed by the bit? I'm a transit AS but not an ISP in the traditional sense, so I just have the normal monthly billing.
