On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Ray Soucy <r...@maine.edu> wrote: > On Wed, Dec 21, 2011 at 2:16 PM, Tomas Podermanski <tpo...@cis.vutbr.cz> > wrote: >> from my perspective the short answer for this never-ending story is: >> >> - SLAAC/RA is totally useless, does not bring any benefit at all >> and should be removed from IPv6 specs
> I'm afraid you're about 10 years too late for this opinion to make > much difference. ;-) I won't go so far as to say SLAAC should be removed from the IPv6 spec but it's never too late to deprecate a protocol that doesn't pan out. I'm with Owen: On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 4:58 AM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > Currently, most significant environments have to cobble together a complete > solution from remnants of SLAAC and DHCP. This is far from ideal. > Far better for organizations to look at 2 complete solutions and pick the > solution that works best for them in their environment. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.comĀ b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004