On Jan 15, 2012 1:40 PM, "Jared Mauch" <ja...@puck.nether.net> wrote: > > > On Jan 15, 2012, at 2:56 PM, Saku Ytti wrote: > > > Unfortunately that does exactly nothing to help with Internet scale. > > > > Now scaling for your local environment embedded RP might be beneficial, but > > actual practical applications where you need ASM are very few. > > > > Most vendors took out hardware multicast support and do it via recirculation > these days. > > I'm more interested in other topics, this would likely be served by a CDN, > and I'm curious if any CDNs have started placing gear behind CGN/LSN. >
CDNs have shown hesitation to receiving traffic from non-unique ipv4 space despite the obvious benefits of CGN bypass. Cb > I've also noticed some hotels and other 'guest net' folks capturing 4.2.2.1 > and comparable open recursive name servers in-house. Two weeks ago I could ping > 4.2.2.1 and get responses when TTL was set to 1 on my outgoing packets. > > - Jared