I would like to point out that in my experience if you do a lot of coding/devops/automation work with SNMP extreme is a lot harder to work with than Cisco and some of their OIDs/MIBs produce unusual results.
Thanks, -Drew -----Original Message----- From: Grant Ridder [mailto:shortdudey...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 27, 2012 3:54 AM To: Erik Bais Cc: nanog list Subject: Re: 10G switchrecommendaton I have experience with the Extreme's Alpine, Blackdiamond, x250, and x450 and i discovered that the command line is fairly different than Cisco, HP, or Dell. However, since they are a relatively small company with a small but strong customer base, their support is fairly good. I can't speak for 10G/40G implementations, but from my experiences, they support has a quick response time and they do quite a bit of lab replication to figure out the exact root cause. -Grant On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 2:32 AM, Erik Bais <eb...@a2b-internet.com> wrote: > We have a full purple network, so my answer for this would be Extreme > Networks. > > Check out the Lipis report on the X670 / x670v 48 port 10G 1U switches. > > vs other vendor equipment : > > http://www.extremenetworks.com/libraries/products/ExtremeX670V_Lippis% > 20Report_Fall.pdf > > > Regards, > Erik Bais > > Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > > Op Jan 26, 2012 om 21:20 heeft Deric Kwok <deric.kwok2...@gmail.com> > het volgende geschreven: > > > Hi all > > > > I would like to have 10G switchrecommendaton Ipref software can test > > around 9.2G but we can have congestion over 6G in single port! > > > > Thank you > > > >
