On Feb 15, 2012, at 6:16 PM, Steve Bertrand wrote: > On 2012.02.15 19:55, Nathan Eisenberg wrote: >>> IPv6 is operational. >> >> How is this a misconception? It works fine for me... > > Imagine an operator who is v6 ignorant, with a home provider who implements > v6 half-assed, and tries to access a v6 site that has perhaps v6-only > accessible nameservers, when their provider who 'offers' v6 has resolvers > that operate only over v4. > > *huge* misconception about the operational status of IPv6 (imho). > > Steve
By that definition, IPv4 is non-operational. You can break anything if you try hard enough. Owen