Greetings I'll +1 Chris's experience with startssl On 18Feb2012, at 10.57, Christopher Morrow wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 10:44 AM, John Peach <john-na...@johnpeach.com> wrote: >> On Sat, 18 Feb 2012 14:27:05 +0100 >> Phil Regnauld <regna...@nsrc.org> wrote: >> >>> toor (lists) writes: >>>> I use http://www.startssl.com/ for all my personal certifcates. I have >>>> not had any issues with the validations (once you have an account you >>>> can validate a domain by sending an email to a predefined list of >>>> contact addresses) and the certificates are issued instantly. >>> >>> "Your request is being held up for review by our personnel". >>> >>> Up to 6 hours. Must be their definition of instant :) >> >> It's nice to see that they actually do random reviews, rather than just >> issuing everything requested. I use startssl and have not had anything >> held for review. > > I've had most of mine held, but almost always I get a response in side > of 20 mins. Really, what I care about here is: > 1) cert validates in almost all clients (mozilla/chrome/mail.app) > 2) controlled/secured by my key, not something made up on the server side > 3) not paying money for random bytes. > > it works and eddy's pretty quick on requests. > > -chris > >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Phil >>> >> >> >> -- >> John >> > -- 李柯睿 Check my PGP key here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.asc Current vCard here: https://www.asgaard.org/~cdl/cdl.vcf
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail