On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > On Feb 27, 2012, at 3:50 PM, William Herrin wrote: >> Meh. What should be fixed is that connect() should receive a name >> instead of an IP address. Having an application deal directly with the >> IP address should be the exception rather than the rule. Then, deal >> with the TTL issues once in the standard libraries instead of >> repeatedly in every single application. >> >> In theory, that'd even make the app code protocol agnostic so that it >> doesn't have to be rewritten yet again for IPv12. > > While I agree with the principle of what you are trying to say, I would argue > that it should be dealt with in getnameinfo() / getaddrinfo() and not > connect(). > > It is perfectly reasonable for connect() to deal with an address structure.
Yes, well, that's why we're still using a layer 4 protocol (TCP) that can't dynamically rebind to the protocol level below (IP). God help us when folks start overriding the ethernet MAC address to force machines to keep the same IPv6 address that's been hardcoded somewhere or is otherwise too much trouble to change. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
