Eugen Leitl wrote: >> For high speed (fixed time) routed look up with 1M entries, SRAM is >> cheap at /24 and is fine at /32 but expensive and power consuming >> TCAM is required at /48. >> >> That's one reason why we should stay away from IPv6. > > What prevents you from using > http://www.nature.com/ncomms/journal/v1/n6/full/ncomms1063.html > with IPv6?
Though I didn't paid $32 to read the full paper, it's like a proposal of geography based addressing. So, I should ask what prevents you from using it with IPv4? Masataka Ohta