On Jun 1, 2012, at 4:28 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > It's extremely hard to find RFC which does not contain incorrect > information or practically undeployable data.
Actual errors in RFC's (typos, incorrect references, etc.) - <http://www.rfc-editor.org/errata.php> Differing views regarding RFC subject material; feel free to work with others of similar to write up your perspective - <http://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc2223.txt> The RFC series is an Internet-wide community effort. Thanks! /John
