> Windows security sucks.

The real problem with Windows is that there exist folks who believe that it is, 
or can be, secured.  They believe the six-colour glossy, the Gartner Reports, 
and other (manufacturers') propaganda.  As a consequence they do not act in a 
fashion which will keep them safe.

> Most users will pick convenience over security.  What fraction of users
> (customers) would be happy with your suggested settings?

More than you might think -- still a minority however.  There's not 2.437 
pounds yet.

> My probably naive view is that this type of problem could easily be solved by
> having the serious work done on a special class of well locked down machines
> and making a pool of more open systems available for checking mail or
> facebook or whatever.

You would be surprised at the number of Fortune 500 companies that lock-down 
their policies into deliberately insecure settings, and refuse to permit more 
secure settings.  I can't quite figure this out, except to observe that there 
is a very severe shortage of security clue in the world and an appalling 
over-abundance of ignorance and stupidity.

> I've heard stories of people filling USB slots with epoxy so idiots can't
> insert thumb drives found in the parking lot or brought from home.  I forget
> the context.

This is, unfortunately, a typical reaction which arises from a failure to carry 
out proper root-cause analysis.  The root cause of the issue is not "thumb 
drives", "baby fingernail drives", or whatever removable media type.  The root 
cause is the propensity of Windows to engage in "magical" behaviour -- to put 
executable "data" everywhere and then to execute that "data", magically.  And a 
failure to provide a "Magic Off" setting that actually works.  Actually, there 
is -- it is called the power switch.  Seriously though most of the magic can be 
turned off or bypassed, if you want to.

Companies that engage in such behaviour are signing their own "all our base are 
belong to you" death warrants.  Rather that voting with their wallets and 
insisting on correction of the root-cause of the problem, they instead continue 
to pour money down the crapper investing in never-ending supplies of draino and 
roto-rooters while at the same time continuing to financially reward the 
paper-towel flushers so they can buy and flush yet more clogging crap which 
requires yet more draino and roto-rooters.  Shampoo, Lather, Rinse, Repeat.  
(Looking up the effects of adding those instructions to shampoo by Proctor & 
Gamble on their sales and profits is left as an exercize for the reader).

Security does not require buying more draino and roto-rooters.  It just 
requires that you not do stupid things inimical to security.  Stop flushing 
paper towels down the toilet and you don't need draino and roto-rooters, nor 
will you need hazmat gear to clean the oozing excrement off the floor.  Of 
course, it might be wise to keep a bottle of draino, a roto-rooter, and some 
hazmat gear on hand just in case -- but to concentrate on the symptoms rather 
than the underlying cause is just plain stupidity.  Deliberately encouraging 
and financing those working to ensure the toilet is always plugged up and the 
crap is always running in the halls is sheer lunacy.  Unfortunately, the 
lunatics are in charge of the asylum, and they have chosen the outcome they 
shall suffer.

Now, back to our regularly scheduled programming, already in progress ...

---
()  ascii ribbon campaign against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org





Reply via email to