On 7/17/2012 5:47 AM, Saku Ytti wrote: > I wonder who really believes there is no usage case for NAT66. Have these > people seen non-trivial corporate networks? > > I'm sure many people in this list finance part of their lives with renumber > projects costing MUSDs. For many companies just finding out where addresses > have been punched in (your FWs, your software, partner FWs, partner > software, configurations...) will take months, before even starting > renumbering.
For those with PA space https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6144 should be a good solution. Doug -- If you're never wrong, you're not trying hard enough