On 7/17/12 3:57 PM, Jeroen Massar wrote: > > I am wondering what you meaning with 'squat', note that what I reference > above is real full RFC4193 calculated ULA. >
By "squat" I meant take a random chunk of IPv6 space and use it as "private" address space. He said: On 7/13/12 7:38 AM, -Hammer- wrote: > I was considering taking the same approach. Maybe using 0100::/8 or > 1000::/4 or A000::/3 as a space for this. And I would say no, use ULA space instead since it's set aside for such things. ~Seth