On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 9:10 AM, Masataka Ohta <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp> wrote: > While ISPs in the future should use not IPv6 but NAT with fixed > IP addresses and sets of port numbers assigned to their customers, > keeping the end to end transparency, it does not solve the > problem of blocked port 25. > > Note that IPv6 do not solve the problem of blocked port 25, either.
So - now with ipv6 you're going to see "hi, my toto highly computerized toilet is trying to make outbound port 25 connections to gmail" http://www.telecoms.com/48734/vodafone-and-ibm-team-up-on-connected-home-appliances/ -- Suresh Ramasubramanian (ops.li...@gmail.com)
