Oliver wrote: >> All that necessary is local changes on end systems of those who >> want the end to end transparency. >> >> There is no changes on the Internet. > > You're basically redefining the term "end-to-end transparency" to suit your > own
Already in RFC3102, which restrict port number ranges, it is stated that: This document examines the general framework of Realm Specific IP (RSIP). RSIP is intended as a alternative to NAT in which the end- to-end integrity of packets is maintained. We focus on implementation issues, deployment scenarios, and interaction with other layer-three protocols. It's you who tries to change the meaning of "end to end transparency". Masataka Ohta