On Sep 13, 2012, at 7:29 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote:
> I'm talking to the people who will probably be, in 2015, running the first 
> Worldcon I can practically drive to, in Orlando, at -- I think -- the Disney
> World Resort.  I've told them how critical the issue is for this market; they,
> predictably, replied "We look forward to your patch".  :-}

So I just want to point out that this is an utterly irrelevant topic. Worldcon 
is full to the brim with really smart people who can build good networks, but 
in every place large enough to host a Worldcon the owners of the building make 
money selling Internet access and don't want competition. The very best we've 
been able to do was create an Internet Lounge with good connectivity, and even 
that isn't acceptable at most locations.

So this really is an irrelevant topic, unless you want to create an LTE network 
with good connectivity near the location and sell bandwidth via that.  (Phones 
and tablets outnumber laptop computers by a facter of 20:1 at scifi conventions)

Off-topic: FWIW Hellsinki is a hell of a lot more likely. Remember that the 
membership votes on where to go, and Orlando really doesn't top anyone's list. 
Especially since Orlando keeps blowing off the very legitimate concerns that 
other people have raised about the location, including that Disney takes a dim 
view of anyone except their own paid actors wearing costumes, and more 
importantly the lack of inexpensive food options.

If for some reason Hellsinki's bid falls apart, Spokane has better facilities 
and good LTE network support.

-- 
Jo Rhett
Net Consonance : net philanthropy to improve open source and internet projects.



Reply via email to