Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >On Oct 7, 2012, at 3:18 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> On Oct 7, 2012 1:48 PM, "Tom Limoncelli" <t...@whatexit.org> wrote: >>> >>> Have there been studies on how much latency CGN adds to a typical >>> internet user? I'd also be interested in anecdotes. >>> >> >> Anecdote. Sub-millasecond, with full load. (gigs and gigs) . CGN does >not >> meaningfully add latency. CGN is not enough of a factor to impact >happy >> eyeballs in a way that improves ipv6 use. >> >>> I've seen theoretical predictions but by now we should have >>> measurements from early-world deployments. >>> >> >> Most mobile providers have been doing what is commonly called cgn for >5 to >> 10 years. CGN is not a new concept or implementation for mobile. >> > >True, but, as we have discussed before, mobile users, especially in the >US, >have dramatically lowered expectations of internet access from their >mobile >devices vs. what they expect from a household ISP. > >We expect half the services we want to be crippled by mobile carriers >because >they don't like competition. We file lawsuits when that happens on our >terrestrial connections. > >Owen
Except now you have to do mediation, since class action lawsuits are now null and void. :) -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.