On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 12:08 PM, Ben S. Butler <ben.but...@c2internet.net> wrote: > Yes, nice. But... It does not address the case when this is >not the ISPs customers but the ISP (read content provider) >that operates globally but without a network interconnecting >their routers.
Hi Ben, That case is covered by things like ARIN's multiple discrete networks policy which permit an ISP /32 or end-user /48 for _each_ distinct network. There are plenty of addresses in IPv6. You should be break up a /32 for traffic engineering purposes, not for the sake of handling multiple disconnected sites. And when exercising TE, you can offer a covering route and expect the network as a whole to still function regardless of other folks' suballocation filtering. Regards, Bill Herrin -- William D. Herrin ................ her...@dirtside.com b...@herrin.us 3005 Crane Dr. ...................... Web: <http://bill.herrin.us/> Falls Church, VA 22042-3004
