On 20 November 2012 16:05, Patrick W. Gilmore <patr...@ianai.net> wrote: > On Nov 20, 2012, at 08:45 , Owen DeLong <o...@delong.com> wrote: > >> It is entirely possible that Google's numbers are artificially low for a >> number >> of reasons. > > AMS-IX publishes stats too: > <https://stats.ams-ix.net/sflow/> > > This is probably a better view of overall percentage on the Internet than a > specific company's content. It shows order of 0.5%. > > Why do you think Google's numbers are lower than the real total? >
They are also different stats which is why they give such different numbers. In a theoretical world with evenly distributed traffic patterns if 1% of users were IPv6 enabled it would require 100% of content to be IPv6 enabled before your traffic stats would show 1% of traffic going over IPv6. If these figures are representative (google saying 1% of users and AMSIX saying 0.5% of traffic) then it would indicate that dual stacked users can push ~50% of their traffic over IPv6. If this is even close to reality then that would be quite an achievement. - Mike