On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 12:15 PM, Cameron Byrne <cb.li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2012 at 8:27 AM, Dobbins, Roland <rdobb...@arbor.net> > wrote: > > > > On Nov 26, 2012, at 10:36 PM, Cameron Byrne wrote: > > > >> Ipv6 is not important for users, it is important for network operators > who want to sustain their business. > > > > I agree with the first part; not sure I agree with the second part. > > > >> Nope. Nobody will leave money on the table by alienating users. > > > > I think it may be possible to make money with compelling IPv6-only > content/services/applications. > > > > I disagree, i simply see an additional fee for IPv4 coming about. +1 And that in itself seems like it would make IPv6-reachable things a lot more compelling.