Sent from my iPad
On Dec 10, 2012, at 3:02 PM, Mark Andrews <ma...@isc.org> wrote: > > In message <50c65c84.6080...@dougbarton.us>, Doug Barton writes: >> On 12/10/2012 01:27 PM, Schiller, Heather A wrote: >>> I think most folks would agree that, IPv4 /32 :: IPv6 /128 as IPv4 /29 :: I >> Pv6 /64 >> >> Quite the opposite in fact. In IPv6 a /64 is roughly equivalent to a /32 >> in IPv4. As in, it's the smallest possible assignment that will allow an >> end-user host to function under normal circumstances. >> >> SWIP or rwhois for a /64 seems excessive to me, FWIW. >> >> Doug > > Even SWIP for a /48 for a residential assignment is excessive. > SWIP for a /48 for a commercial assignment is reasonable > I disagree. SWIP for a /48 with the appropriate notations under residential customer privacy policy provides a good balance between the need for public accountability of resource utilization and privacy concerns for residential customer assignments. Owen
