----- Original Message -----
> From: "Masataka Ohta" <mo...@necom830.hpcl.titech.ac.jp>

> In addition, as PON is even less efficient initially when
> subscriber density is low and there are few subscribers to
> share a field splitter (unless extremely lengthy drop cables
> are used, which costs a lot), PON is slower to pay them off.

In case you missed it, I was the OP, and you don't have to convince *me*
not to use PON; I already didn't want to.

Cheers,
-- jra
-- 
Jay R. Ashworth                  Baylink                       j...@baylink.com
Designer                     The Things I Think                       RFC 2100
Ashworth & Associates     http://baylink.pitas.com         2000 Land Rover DII
St Petersburg FL USA               #natog                      +1 727 647 1274

Reply via email to